The best quotes from "Master and Margarita". Unrivaled quotes from the novel The Master and Margarita There are no evil people there are people unhappy essays

#
The past does not matter, find yourself in the present and you will rule in the future.

#
Initially, he treated me with hostility and even insulted me, that is, he thought he was insulting, calling me a dog, - then the prisoner grinned, - I personally do not see anything wrong in this beast to take offense at this word ...

#
There are no evil people in the world, there are only unhappy people.

#
- Name?
- Mine? - the arrested man hastily responded, expressing with all his being his readiness to answer sensibly, not to cause more anger.
The procurator said in a low voice:
- Mine - I know. Don't pretend to be more stupid than you are.

#
- "Kind people"? Do you call everyone that?
- All evil people are not in the world.

#
All power is violence against people. The time will come when there will be no authority of either the Caesars or any other authority. A person will pass into the kingdom of truth and justice, where no power will be needed at all.

#
... agree that only the one who hung it can probably cut the hair?

#
Among other things, I said, - said the prisoner, - that all power is violence against people and that the time will come when there will be no power of either the Caesars or any other power. A person will pass into the kingdom of truth and justice, where no power will be needed at all.

#
... cowardice is undoubtedly one of the worst vices. No, philosopher, I object to you. This is the worst vice.

In a psychiatric hospital, Ivan, by the force of circumstances insurmountable for him, was forced to take up the matter of the highest usefulness in any pre-crisis and crisis situations: rethinking your past life and intentions for the future.Thus, getting to the clinic for Ivan (as well as for many real people who are not able to escape with their meaningful will from the stream of vanity that draws them through life) was a providential blessing, because otherwise he would have been writing poetry until the end of his days - “monstrous! " (according to his conscience), from which he himself felt sick.

In the novel, this psychiatric hospital is a knot in which storylines are intertwined, containing various fragments of the story "about Pilate." This storyline is represented by three fragments:

· The first (Ch. 2) can be conditionally called "The Gospel of Woland" - his, reaching to the obvious obviousness, narration about the events of the beginning of our era, which took place on the 14th of the spring month of Nisan in the city of Yershalaim, Berlioz and Homeless, while the three of them were sitting on a bench at the Patriarch's Dam and each in his own way “waited for the tram”;

· The second (Ch. 16) - a dream that Ivan Bezdomny, pumped up with sedatives, had a dream during his stay in a psychiatric hospital;

· The third (Ch. 25) - one of the burned copies of the manuscript of the master's novel about Pilate, re-embodied by Woland (during the materialization of the manuscript, Margarita, admiring Woland, froze stupidity: "Omnipotent, omnipotent!" - although only God is omnipotent and omnipotent).

For the most part, it is this story "about Pilate" that literary critics and readers alike possess a demonic structure of the psyche, and identify with the theological views of Bulgakov himself, without completing the idea that he had chosen to express his opinion in general then unseemly "lyrical heroes". This circumstance - the inappropriateness of the "lyrical heroes" and the scenes of action in which this plot is revealed to the reader, leads us to the opinion that the "Gospel of Michael" is not disguised by him as "The Gospel of Woland" or "a novel in a novel" written by the master , in relation to which all other storylines are the carrier and frame; and that the "Gospel of Michael" is the whole novel in the interweaving of all its plot lines, without exception or giving selective preference to any one of them. At the same time, much, due to the specifics of the characters involved in the plot, is simply unacceptable to be understood directly and literally, since otherwise a logical approach to nonsense such as the following is inevitable:

“In May 1939 Bulgakov made fundamental changes to this episode: in front of Woland, Matvey Levy appears with request(highlighted in bold V. Losev) Yeshua that Satan "take the master with him and reward him with peace." Thus, Bulgakov in a later edition departs from the concept of subordination of the “kingdom of darkness” to the “kingdom of light” and makes them at least equal in rights ”(Viktor Losev, Comments on the publication of chapters from early versions of the novel in the journal“ Slovo ”, No. 8 , 1991, p. 74).

We will comment on this episode later, and now we will return to the plot “about Pilate” as a whole. For those familiar with the New Testament texts, it is perceived as another version, repeating the New Testament messages, albeit differing from them in some details, which - depending on their correlation with other circumstances or their isolated consideration - seem to be either minor or extremely important. ... At the same time, from the point of view of the majority, who are not keepers of faith in the impeccable accuracy of the canonical biblical narratives, there are no special discrepancies with the canonical texts in this plot. Everything is one at a superficial glance: arrested on the denunciation of Judas; the Sanhedrin sentenced to death and referred the sentence to the procurator's approval; the procurator did not want to approve the death sentence, but under the pressure of the threat to denounce him to the Roman emperor Tiberius himself, he lost heart and approved the sentence; crucified together with the robbers; died on the cross; buried, though not so and not there, as the canonical New Testament texts tell about it ... Although in this plot there is, first, what Yeshua did before his arrest; secondly, what happened after the burial of the body is nevertheless recognizable, and what is not said is known from the common biblical culture. What's so special about that?

For the majority, the question does not arise how much will coincide what Mikhail Bulgakov left in the silences with what is directly said in the New Testament texts. Moreover, for them, the question arising from the first does not arise: how much coincide in what exactly disagreement on the one hand of M.A. Bulgakov, and on the other hand of the authors, censors and editors of the New Testament texts?

But in order to continue considering this storyline and related issues further, it is necessary to recall that many writers claimed that their characters live independent lives in their works, regardless of the will and intentions of the author of the work. This happens because the author, having conceived a character, imagines a certain personality in his psyche, endowing it according to his understanding with morality, knowledge, worldview and everything else that characterizes any individual. After that, a more or less independent algorithmic module is formed in the author's psyche, which is an artistic image-character, which acts “automatically” in the plot, based on everything that the author provided him in the “virtual reality” of the world he invented. This concept of artistic creation explains why the originated and caused by the personality of the character acts in the plot more or less independently of the author himself, whose psyche works on the basis of a different morality, different knowledge, a different algorithm of thinking.

In accordance with this understanding of artistic creation, it is not the writer who, having created some kind of storyline, distributes its “theatrical performance” between the characters, but the characters imagined by him “live real life” in the author's psyche, composing this storyline in his imaginary world alternately or in parallel, mutually complementing or refuting each other, and the author's inner vision is just there. At the same time, some characters, possessing a certain independence in the author's psyche, can rely on common for them arrays of information known to the author, and allocated for a group of characters in his psyche; either through the author's psyche to have direct access to the information of egregors to which the author is included, even if he does not have conscious access to this information or denies the possibility of its existence somewhere other than in the world of his work. In such a concept and in the life practice of artistic creation, the author is left with the task of ensuring a sufficient number of characters, correcting their personal qualities, and through this, the algorithm of their interaction in the plot of the work is adjusted. Sometimes a work is obtained on the first try in one breath, and sometimes it takes decades to fine-tune the algorithm for the development of a plot and its individual fragments.

All this is similar to a computer game, but the creation of which and the development of its algorithms take place in the author's psyche, and not in the computer software environment.

Only in this mode of creativity, a work of art is obtained "as if it were alive." When constructing a storyline by the author himself, with the subsequent distribution of its "theatrical performance" between the puppets-puppets he has constructed, painted to resemble characters, a lifeless "music box" is obtained, which is set in motion by an energy "spring", which first unfolds from the psyche of the author himself, and then from the psyche of the reader.

An example of this kind of psycho-mechanical movable structures, vampirically working at the expense of the reader's energy, is Dostoevsky's The Demons, who himself admitted that this novel of his is the result of constructing a plot with predetermined results. In “The Master and Margarita”, MABulgakov actually got it “like in life”, but not a dead vampiric psycho-mechanical construction.

Therefore, before proceeding to the consideration of the embedded plot "about Pilate", it is necessary to list the main characters of the entire novel who are directly related to this plot:

First of all, it is an anonymous storyteller, to whom the author is given to witness the development of all the storylines of our time, to view the dreams of other characters , read their thoughts, and then talk about it, interweaving different storylines with each other;

· Woland, representing the image of Satan, formed in the psyche of M. A. Bulgakov himself on the basis of informal theological education in the family and his own observations of the flow of events in real life;

· A master whose essence is clear without any special explanations: he was engaged in science, fell into a "crisis of the genre", as a result of which he moved away from scientific research and began to resolve his moral and worldview problems (internal contradictions in the psyche that he recognized and not realized) in artistic creation, what led him to yet another crisis, in which he got bogged down hopelessly;

Margarita, has nothing to do with the intellectual-rational development and provision of the plot "about Pilate" with information about the facts of the religious history of mankind: in relation to this plot, she is one of the first keen on himreaders and, possibly, the “muse” that directly inspired the master to work, since psychologically, and above all emotionally, the master was almost completely dependent on her.

· Ivan Ponyrev, the bearer of the literary pseudonym "Homeless", which could be called parallel to his main pseudonym and the second pseudonym: Maddom.

But if these were characters who can be called primary in relation to the plot "about Pilate", then in this very plot line there are also secondary characters, not in the sense that they have a secondary significance, but in the sense that they themselves are such as they appear in the novel are the offspring of the named primary characters: Woland, Homeless, the master, from whose faces the storyline "about Pilate" is presented in the novel. As a result, Pilate himself, Yeshua, Levi Matthew, the head of the Sanhedrin (Sanhedrin - in a different transliteration; translated into Russian - the supreme council), the high priest Kaifa turned out to be secondary characters. Therefore, one should distinguish when anonymous speaks about one of them. narrator (witness to everything he describes),and when someone else from the primary characters speaks about them. At the same time, all the primary characters associated with the storyline "about Pilate" are united by some common for them arrays of information inherent in both the psyche of Bulgakov himself and available through the egregors to which it was closed. On the basis of the arrays of this information, the primary characters act, and from them they select information about the secondary characters, in accordance with the morality given to them by M.A. Bulgakov, worldview, psyche algorithms and other personal capabilities of each of the primary characters. At the heart of these arrays of information lies both real history (mostly memorable egregorially) and its display in historical myths inherent in the culture of mankind, which in many respects differ from real history, since myths express the understanding of history by people, and not God's Providence, carried out in the global historical process, in the predetermination of its meaning by God himself.

As a result, the storyline "about Pilate" develops as a mutually acceptable compromise between the primary characters, and finds its reflection in it - discreetas in real life - the Providence of God; more precisely, not the Providence itself as such, but the characteristic-figurative idea of \u200b\u200bthe Providence that has developed in the psyche of M.A. Bulgakov, corresponding to what was said in Ch. 19 of the 3rd book of Kings and reflected in the plot of the novel.

Neither Woland, nor Maddomny, nor the master dispute the plot fragments presented by the other two narrators, and the coincidence of circumstances is such that the personal copyright for the novel "about Pilate" goes to the master, who captured on paper what was hovering in the collective unconscious of what Bulgakov had invented the world in which the primary characters lived. At the same time, of them, only Woland's consciousness was a contemporary of the events described in the story "about Pilate", as a result of which everything else can be considered partially as satanic obsessions into the psyche of those who evade the guidance of God. But since Woland himself acted within the boundaries of providential permission from Above, then his story is not useless and meaningless for those who sincerely strive to find the truth.

Of course, Woland concealed from what he knew, everything that he considered harmful to people for the implementation of his intentions both in relation to his interlocutors personally and in relation to all mankind. Somewhere he lied or provided an opportunity to be deceived by others; he blurted out something harmful to himself out of pride, proceeding from the prejudice that "these dumb fools" would not understand what they were saying as they should, and Berlioz immediately provided another reason to Woland to confirm his opinion, directing his feet under the tram. Woland blurted out something about the limitedness of his worldview and his limited ability to foresee the consequences. Well, most importantly:

Throughout his history of falling away from God, Satan himself has repeatedly fallen into self-deception, as a result of which his memory and the algorithms of his psyche could not help but accumulate a fair amount of errors and delusions that he is unable to identify and eliminate, persisting in his stay at odds with God ...

This means that in essence M.A. Bulgakov, not being a recognized certified theologian, worked on the problem: consideration on the meritsthe possibility of Satan's imitation of Revelation from Above within the limits of the fundamentally possible allowance for Satan to take such action. Theologians of all religions, without exception, leave it both in relation to what they themselves preach, and in relation to what other believers profess and preach.

Consideration of this problem cannot destroy or eradicate true faith, but it poses a danger to the enslavement of society by the cult of all kinds of social magic. Accordingly, avoiding consideration of this problem, professional theologians of all faiths thereby testify to their lack of freedom, and as a result, to falling away from the Truth: "If you abide in My word, you are truly My disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free." (as recounted by John 8:31, 32).

How the master reacted to everything told and inspired by him in his thoughts is known from the novel itself. Once in a psychiatric hospital, he stole the keys from the nurse Praskovya Fyodorovna, which is one of the characteristics of the master's real thieving morality, and with their help he entered the ward, where Ivan Bezdomny was burdened by himself. After Ivan, whose impressions have not yet been erased, presumably experiencing , word for word, he told the master the Gospel of Woland, the master exclaimed: “Oh, how I guessed! Oh, how I guessed! " By this he recognized for himself the complete truth of the "gospel from Woland" that coincided with his novel about the events that took place in Yershalaim at the beginning of the present era.

In our understanding of being, if a person is interested in the issues of the relationship between God and humanity and resolves questions raisedwith God's help before him in the mainstream of considering this problem, sincerely, not cunning before his conscience, then with God's help these problems will be solved righteously, and a person cannot fall into depression, run away from people, become mentally ill or possessed: he will become more and more cheerful, embracing more and more sides of life with his sanity growing in righteousness.

That is, everything that happened to the master suggests that something is false in his morality and, as a result, in his psyche. Therefore, at least, he did not understand the truth of what he himself wrote, wading through the veil of lies of delusions from Woland and the lies that have accumulated in the prevailing culture, and as a maximum, what he wrote is somewhat false.

To answer substantive questions of this kind, it is necessary to consider two components of the master's novel:

• one that repeats the testimonies of the canonical New Testament Gospels;

· The one that contradicts them.

Let's start with what contradicts. To the question of the procurator:

My? - Hastily responded the arrested "Yeshua", with all his being expressing his readiness to answer sensibly, without causing any more anger "Before that, the centurion Mark the Rat-Slayer led Yeshua out of the colonnade where Pilate was interrogating, hit him with a whip, and explained how to behave in front of the procurator."

The procurator said in a low voice:

Mine - I know. Don't pretend to be more stupid than you are. Your.

Yeshua, - the prisoner answered hastily.

Do you have a nickname?

Where you're from?

From the city of Gamala, the prisoner replied, showing with his head that there, somewhere far, to his right, in the north, there is the city of Gamala.

What blood are you?

I don’t know for sure, ”the arrested man answered vividly,“ I don’t remember my parents. I was told that my father was a Syrian ... "

Yeshua's answer to the question equally denies both the biblical and the Koranic testimonies of the birth and childhood of Christ, according to which he knew his parents, knew about his conception as a righteous virgin from the Holy Spirit, which is unnatural in terms of everyday life.

In the version of the events of The Master and Margarita, Yeshua is an ordinary person, of which there are many, but who differs from the overwhelming majority in that he is purposefully active, joyful and fearless with faith and trust in God as his further replies to Pilate show, and generously shares his knowledge and understanding of what is happening and prospects with all those around him who are ready to listen to him, making no exceptions for anyone.

After Yeshua had helped Pilate by healing him from a migraine attack, Pilate ordered him to be untied, and the conversation continued:

“What do you want me to swear? - asked, very animated, untied.

Well, at least by your life, - replied the procurator, - it's time to swear by it, since it hangs by a thread, know this!

Don't you think you hung her up, hegemon? - asked the prisoner, - if so, then you are very mistaken.

Pilate shuddered and answered through clenched teeth:

I can cut this hair.

And in this you are mistaken, - the prisoner objected, smiling brightly and shielding his hand from the sun, - you must agree that only the one who hung it can probably cut the hair?

So, so, - Pilate said with a smile ... "

The hint was made very transparent and in Russian it is expressed in the proverb “we all walk under God”, and without His Holy Will, it’s not that no life will end, but not a single hair from the head will fall. And all of Yeshua's behavior in this dialogue shows that he happily entrusted his life, death and posthumous existence to God.

So, so, - Pilate said with a smile, - now I have no doubt that the idle onlookers in Yershalaim followed you on your heels. I don't know who hung your tongue, but it hangs well. By the way, tell me: is it true that you came to Yershalaim through the Susa gate astride a donkey, accompanied by a crowd of rabble, shouting greetings to you like a certain prophet? - here the procurator pointed to a roll of parchment.

The prisoner looked at the procurator in bewilderment.

I don’t even have a donkey, hegemon, ”he said. “I came to Yershalaim exactly through the Suzskaya gate, but on foot, accompanied by only Matthew Levi, and no one shouted anything to me, since no one knew me in Yershalaim then.”

This is a refutation of the scene of Christ's solemn entry into Jerusalem on a young donkey accompanied by the joyful exclamations of the crowd “Hosanna! Hosanna! ”, Which the biblical confessional tradition of the churches named after Christ insists on.

“Don't you know such,” continued Pilate, not taking his eyes off the prisoner, “a certain Dismas, another — Gestas, and a third — Bar-Rabban?

I don't know these kind people, ”the prisoner replied.

Now tell me that it is you who use the words "good people" all the time? Do you call everyone that?

All, - the prisoner answered, - there are no evil people in the world.

This is the first time I hear about it, - said Pilate, grinning, - but maybe I know little about life! You don't have to write down further, - he turned to the secretary, although he did not write anything down anyway, and continued to say to the prisoner: - In any of the Greek books have you read about this?

No, I got to that point with my mind.

And do you preach it?

The doctrine of the universal goodness of people proclaimed by Yeshua and openly preached by him knows no exceptions both in relation to all people in the aggregate, and in relation to each person personally.

He does not know, among other things, in relation to Mark who severely beat him with Ratslayer and Judas from Kiriath (Iscariot), who provoked him at the instigation of the Sanhedrin masters to violate the Roman law "on insult to greatness." This is not blindness in the question of who Yeshua is really dealing with (a sincere follower, a benevolent disciple, or a notorious provocateur), as many understand it.

This is a PRINCIPLE OF LIFE, KNOWING NO EXCEPTIONS and assuming that God knows who He brings Yeshua to and whom He brings to him; Yeshua's duty, first of all, before God is to convey his understanding of Truth-Truth to everyone with whom God allows him to meet... This principle is intended to be followed in his life by every person in all circumstances, without exception.

And in relation to him, the question of whether the historically real Christ was conceived like all people in the copulation of a man and a woman, which is reported in the "Gospel of Woland", or the Holy Spirit was conceived, as the New Testament texts and the Koran claim, does not matter. ... In addition, the incarnation of Christ, conceived of the Holy Spirit, as can be understood from the Bible, is not the most amazing incarnation. It describes another incarnation of the governor of God on Earth not only without a father, but also without a mother. In Hebrews, the apostle Paul in ch. 7 writes the following:

"one. For Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, the one who met Abraham and blessed him, returning after the defeat of the kings, 2. to whom Abraham separated tithes from everything (see the book of Genesis, ch. 14:18 - 20), - first, according to the sign of the name, the king of righteousness, and then the king of Salem, that is, the king of the world, 3. without a father, without a mother, without a genealogy, without a beginning of days or an end of life (italicized by us when quoting: but all the same, Melchizedek was not raised to the rank of a deity, even with all these wonderful properties), being like the Son of God, he remains a priest forever. 4. You see how great he is, to whom the patriarch Abraham also gave tithes of his best spoils. "

That is, the question of the method of incarnation is far from being as significant for life as it is presented to the flock of the church in the name of Christ. The question of the nature of Christ's conception lies in a different area: if historically it really happened that in the era of the first advent there were not a single couple of men and women, such that their heredity (bodily and spiritual) would allow a person to be born and grow up who would be free from delusions of the era and could reveal to everyone else that ideal of the dignity of Man, which is predetermined by the Almighty God, Creator and Almighty, so that all people would comprehend this undistorted ideal and each embodied it in himself, then God embodied this ideal by the conception of Jesus Christ as a righteous Virgin from The Holy Spirit.

But the churches named after Christ, focusing the attention of the churchgoers on the sacrament of the conception of Jesus, substitute their teachings about this event, which no one can repeat but God, understanding of the issue of life principles that Jesus followed in his life in communication with all people and that everyone is capable of following with God's help in his life. And this is the anti-Christian essence of every supposedly Christian cult. And as a result of this centuries-old policy of the hierarchs of churches and their behind-the-scenes masters, one of the censures of the neighbor for his inherent spiritual and material generosity and disinterestedness in relation to others in society is poured into a chased vicious form : "Christ was found ..." and others like her, in which the likeness of a person to Christ for certain good qualities should be perceived by him as an insult and censure.

In addition, the accusations of MA Bulgakov of a blasphemous (from the point of view of those who call themselves “Christians”) refusal to recognize the fact of Christ's conception from the Holy Spirit are groundless, no matter what the church-going literary critics may say about this. It should be noted that the version of the conception of Christ from the Holy Spirit in the plot of the novel is directly disputed by the materialist atheist MA Berlioz in his lecture on mythology for Ivan Bezdomny, and besides, it is also expressed in one phrase in the Gospel of Woland. The difference between the version of Berlioz and Woland is only that Berlioz did not know Christ during his lifetime and therefore disputes the very fact of his existence in the past; and Woland talks about Yeshua, whom he saw in life as an ordinary righteous man abandoned by God, pursuing at least two goals in his story:

Firstly, consign to oblivion one of the unpleasant facts of God's direct intervention in earthly affairs, as a result of which the Most Pure Virgin Mary gave birth in a supernatural way A person in all the fullness of his dignity;

And secondly, so that others would be discouraged in their earthly life to trust God and put their hopes on Him, - to build on God in vain Judah's sin of betraying the righteous man who trusted him.

But the same vain betrayal of God the righteous one who trusted Him, starting from the stage of the Predestination of the Universe being, erect on God and the church the name of Christ. M.A. Bulgakov, speaking in the person of the anonymous narrator leading the narration of the parable novel, did not express his opinion on the issue of the conception of Christ, leaving to answer it to each of the readers of the novel sincerely, according to his conscience, but as can be seen from the comments to the novel, most literary critics, when answering this question, identify themselves either with Berlioz or with Woland, attributing their characteristic views to M.A. Bulgakov.

And further: promotion to rank immaculate the exclusive conception of Christ by Mary the Virgin from the Holy Spirit is indeed one of the blasphemous, satanic positions of the church doctrine, blasphemously in silence assuming that all other conceptions of people are doomed by God himself to be vicious. Christ's conception by the Holy Spirit is wonderful and truly immaculately... But also immaculately (although devoid of the aura of a supernatural miracle) all conception man as spouses to whom God has bestowed His Love. And such a conception should become the norm in the life of society. Wicked is any conception that took place without the Love bestowed by God, that occurred only on the basis of working out the algorithms for copulating a man and a woman under the guidance of exclusively animal instincts or an excess of energy out of boredom, regardless of whether such a conception occurred in a ritually consecrated marriage, or it happened in fornication of spouses or bachelors.

The rationale for the statement "there are no evil people in the world" in the novel is also simple:

"These kind people (...) did not learn anything ..."

In other words:

Evil - in a vicious culture where a righteous upbringing has not been developed and where people learn the truth by mistakes, - objectively inevitable, as a result of which it is objectively inappropriate to assign responsibility for it to any of them, i.e. such accusations are unjust and unrighteous themselves, no matter what any of the people have done and whoever accuses him of it.

Such a view, despite its apparent simplicity, however, does not relieve a person of the responsibility to strive for righteousness, and is not a proclamation of connivance to a vicious lifestyle and the cult of vice as a norm, as it seems at first superficial glance: Yeshua himself sincerely lives in harmony with his conscience, and his activities are aimed at transforming the morality and psyche of everyone with whom he communicates, regardless of how low the people around him have fallen, and no matter what evil they do.

The overwhelming majority of those who disagree with the teachings of the Christian churches and who are aware of the New Testament episode "Christ and the Sinner" (John, ch. 8), consider themselves free from the mission of finding the truth and enlightening others, and therefore, such forgiveness is regarded as a default corruption society and youth “obvious” (for them) impunity for vice. In Christian churches, however, the doctrine of forgiveness really turns into a means of corrupting society with impunity for an undeniable vice, due to the fact that the churches are bogged down in the swamp of deadly dogmas, into which the Patriarch's dams turned the living teaching of Christ.

The statement "there are no evil people in the world" is just a statement the fact hidden in the depths of the Universe being,the realization of which obliges everyone who understands this to develop and give people a true teaching about life, on the basis of which the kindness inherent in all of them will be ineradicably manifested. But this is only the intra-social side of what Yeshua said - his sociological doctrine, which he puts into practice with all his activities in all circumstances without exception:

“But, for example, the centurion Mark, he was nicknamed the Ratslayer, - is he kind?

Yes, - replied the prisoner, - he is really an unhappy person. Since then, as good people disfigured him, he became cruel and callous. (…) If we could talk to him, - the prisoner suddenly said dreamily, - I am sure that he would have changed dramatically. (...)

I see that some kind of misfortune has happened because of what I spoke to this young man from Kiriath. I, hegemon, have a premonition that misfortune will happen to him, and I am very sorry for him.

I think, - the procurator answered with a strange laugh, - that there is still someone in the world whom you should have pitied more than Judas of Kiriath, and who will have much worse than Judas! So, Mark Rat-slayer, a cold and convinced executioner, people who, as I see, - the procurator pointed to Yeshua's disfigured face, - they beat you for your sermons, the robbers Dismas and Gestas, who killed four soldiers with their attendants, and finally, a dirty traitor Judas - are they all good people?

Yes, the prisoner answered.

And the kingdom of truth will come?

It will come, hegemon, - Yeshua answered with conviction.

It will never come! - Pilate suddenly shouted in such a terrible voice that Yeshua staggered back. (…) He raised his commanding voice still, shouting out the words so that they could hear in the garden: - Criminal! Criminal! Criminal!

Yeshua Ha-Nozri, do you believe in any gods?

God is one, - answered Yeshua, - in Him I believe “I believe and trust Him, we will add when quoting”.

So pray to him! Pray stronger! However, - here the voice of Pilate sat down, - it will not help ... "

In fearless faith in God, at one "pole", and in unbelief in God, stemming from mixed fears, regardless of faith in God or lack of faith in Him, at the other "pole" - the limits of differences between all kind people... There are no evil people in the world.

P DB, FSCH OE RIPTS ABOUT UMBVPKHNOPZP, - FIIP PFCHFIM RTPLKHTBFPT Y KHMSCHVOKHMUS LBLPK-FP UFTBYOPK KHMSCHVLPK, - FBL RPLMSOYUSH, UFP VSCHTBFP OE.
- YUEN IPYUEYSH FSH, YUFPVSH S RPLMSMUS? - URTPUIM, PYUEOSH PTSYCHYCHYUSH, TBCHSBOOSCHK.
- oh, IPFS VSCh TSY'OSHA FCHPEA, - PFCHFIM RTPLHTBFPT, - EA LMSUFSHUS UBNPE CHTENS, FBL LBL POB CHYUIF ABOUT CHMPULE, JOBK IFP!
- OE DHNBEYSH MY FSH, UFP FSH EE RPDCHEUIM, YZENPO? - URTPUIM BTEUFBOF, - EUMY LFP FBL, FSC PYUEOSH PYIVBEYSHUS.
RIMBF CHEDTPZOKHM Y PFCHEFIM ULCHPHSH YHVSCH:
- with the RETTEBFSH refinery LFPF CHMPUPL.
- nd CH ЬFPN FSH PYIVBEYSHUS, - UCHEFMP HMSCHVBSUSH Y'BUMPOSSUSH THLPK PF UPMOGB, CHP'TBYM BTEUFBOF, - UPZMBUYUSH, UFP RETTEBFSH MPFCHUPCHEPL NPHC?
- fBL, FBL, - KHMSCHVOKHCHYYUSH, ULBBBM RIMBF, - FERETSH S OE UPNOE CHBAUSH CH FPN, UFP RTBDOSCHE HECHBLY CH eTYMBMBYNE IPDIMY БB FPVPA RP RSFBN. oE BOBA, LFP RPDCHEUIM FCHPK SSCHL, OP RPDCHEEO PO IPTPYP. LUFBFY, ULBTSY: CHETOP MY, UFP FSH SCHYMUS CHETIBMBYN YUETE UKHULYE CHETPFB CHETIPN ABOUT PUMA, UPRTPCHPCDBENSCHK FPMRPA YUETOY, LTYYUBCHYCHYEK FEFEBEL? - FHF RTPLHTBFPT KHLBBM ABOUT UCHIFPL RETZBNEOFB.
BTUFFBOF OEDPKHNEOOP RPZMSDEM ABOUT RTPLHTBFPTB.
- x NEOS Y PUMB-FP OYLBLPZP OEF, YZENPO, - ULBBM PO. - rTYEM S CHETMBMBYN FPYUOP YUETE UHUULYE CHPTPFB, OP REYLPN, CH UPRTPCHPTSDEOY PPOPZP MECHIS nBFCHES, Y OILFP NOE OYUEZP OE LTYLFYBL O FBYEZP OE LTYLFYBL O FB
- OOBEESH MY FSH FBLYI, - RTPDPMTSBM RIMBF, OE UCHPDS ZMB U BTEUFBOFB, - OELPEZP DYUNBUB, DTHZPZP - zEUFBUB Y FTEFSHEZBCH - CHBT-TBB?
- FYI DPVTSHI MADEK S OE BOBA, - PFCHEFIM BTEUFBOF.
- rTBCHDB?
- rTBCHDB.
- b FERETSH ULBTSY NOE, UFP LFP FSCH CHUE CHTENS HRPFTEVMSEYSH UMPCHB "DPVTSHE MADY"? fSC CHUEI, UFP MY, FBL OBSCHBEYSH?
- CHUEI, - PFCHEFIM BTEUFFBOF, - COMMUNITY MADEK OEF ABOUT UCHEF.
- EXTREMELY UMSCHYH PF LFPN, - ULBBM RIMBF, HUNEIOCHCHYUSH, - OP, NPTSEF VSCHFSH, WITH NBMP ОOBA TSYЪOSH! NPCFE DBMSHOOE OE ОBRYUSCHCHBFSH, - PVTBFIMUS PO L UELTEFBTA, IPFS FPF J FBL OYUEZP OE BRYUSCHCHBM, J RTPDPMTSBM ZPCHPTYFSH
BTEUFBOFKH: - h LBLPK-OYVKHSH Y ZTEUEULYI LOIS FSC RTPUEM PW LFPN?
- oEF, S UCHPYN KhNPN DPYEM DP LFPZP.
- th FSh RTPRPCHEDHESH LFP?
- dB.
- b CPF, OBRTYNET, LEOFKHTYPO NBTL, EZP RTPJCHBMY lTSCHUPVPEN, - PO - DPVTSCHK?
- dB, - PFCHEFIM BTEUFFBOF, - PO, RTBCHDB, OEUYUBUFMYCHSCHK YUEMPCHEL. at FEI RPT LBL DPVTSCHE MADI YHTPDPCHBMY EZP, PO UFBM CEUFPL Y YUETUFCH. yOFETEUOP VSCh BOBFSH, LFP EZP YULBMEUIM.
- PIPFOP NPZKH UPPVEYFSH LFP, - PFPUCHBMUS RIMBF, - YVP WITH VSCHM UCHYDEFEMEN LFPZP. DPVTSCHE MADI VTPUBMYUSH ABOUT OEZP, LBL UPVBLY ABOUT NEDCHEDS. ZETNBOGSCH CHGERYMYUSH ENKH CH YEA, CH THLY, CH OPZY. REPFOSCHK NBEYRKHM RPRBM CH NEYPL, Y EUMY VSCH OE CHTKHVYMBUSH U ZhMBOZB LBCHBMETYKULBS FKHTNB, B LPNBODPCHBM EA S, - FEVE, ZHYMPUPZH, OYUF VCHBYBYM. ьFP VSCHMP CH VPA RTY yDYUFBCHYP, CH DPMYOE DECH.
- EUMY VSCH U OYN RPZPCHPTYFSH, - CHDTKHZ NEUFBFEMSHOP ULBBBM BTEUFBOF, - WITH HCHETEO, UFP ON TELP YUNEOIMUS VSCH.
- with RPMBZBA, - PFPJChBMUS RIMBF, - UFP NBMP TBDPUFJ FSh DPUFBCHYM VSCH MEZBFKH MEZIPOB, EUMY VSCH CHDKHNBM TBJZPCHBTEYCHBFSH U LEN-OYVKHDPZHM Y LEN-OYVKHDPZHM Y CHRTPYUEN, LFPZP Y OE UMKHYUIFUS, L PVEENH UYUBUFSHA, Y RETCHSCHK, LFP PV LFPN RP'BVPFYFUS, VHDKH S.
books.rusf.ru/unzip/xussr_av/bulgam01.htm?3/50

OBCHETOPE, AF YUFP YOBYUBMSHOP TSYCHPE UHEEUFCHP, OBDEMEOOPE VPZPUPOBAEYN TBHNPN, UCHPVPDOP PF NBFETYBMSHOPK YMMAYY, LPFPTBS, PVCHPMBLYCHBS UPOBOYE, BUFBCHMSEF DEKUFCHPCHBFSH FP UHEEUFCHP B ZPYUFYYUEULYI GEMS. yMY, UFP-FP VMYALPE L LFPNKH.

DPCHPMSHOP FHNBOOPE CHSCHULBSCCHBOYE))

RPFPNH CHETUYS, PUOPCHBOOBS ON RPOSFYSI bODTEEChB RTEDUFBCHMSEFUS HOE VPMEE RPDIPDSEEK MPZYYUOPK Q: NBFETYS, dv LPFPTPK UDEMBO ZHYYYUEULYK NYT NY YUEMPCHEL - UCHEFMBS NBFETYS YMY, FYRB, UPDBOOBS rTPChYDEOGYBMShOSchNY UYMBNY. oE NPZKH UFPRTPGEOFOP HFCHETTSDBFSH, UFP DENPOYUEULBS NBFETYS FP TSE UBNPE, UFP FЈNOBS YMY BOFINBFETYS, OP CHRPMOE CHETPSFOP, RPYUENH VSH Y OEF. chP'NPTSOP, LFP Y RPDTBHNECHBMPUSH, B YNEOOP, UFP X CHUEEI MADEK YOBYUBMSHOP UCHEFMBS RTYTPDB. yNIP.

RETCHSCHK TB UMSCHYKH FBLPE UMCHP. th JCHHYUBOYE X OESP OE YCHTYYFULPE.
SFP LBUBEFUS, UENEOY DSHSCHPMB CH YUEMPCHELE ", FP J VE'ECHTEKULPK NYUFYLY RPOSFOP, SFP CH LBTSDPK MYUOPUFY EUFSH J FENOPE, Y UCHEFMPE.

DAMP OE UPCHUEN CH OBMIYUY UCHEFMPZP Y FЈNOPZP. with DHNBMB, UFP YNEEFUS OELIK, RKHUFSH DBCE UYNCHPMYUEEULY YBLPDYTPCHBOOSCHK, CHZMSD OB NEIBOYAN / FEIOPMPZYA RPSCHMEOIS YMYUEPYPYP TsBMSh, UFP chSh Pv LFPN OE UMSHIBMY.

X ECHTEECH CHUЈ CHPPVEE RP-DTHZPNH. PUPVEOOP X UPCHTENEOOSHI IBUIDHCH. X OYI RPOSFICE ЪMB CHPPVEE OEF, LBL FBLPCHPZP. OE BLGEOFYTHEFUS ABOUT FFPN CHOINBOYE.
CHPTPU CHPPVEE OE LPYETOSCHK. DCHB OEYUЈFLYI RPOSFYS CHNEUFE DBAF VEULPOEYUOHA DYURETUYA UNSCHUMB.

YHDEKULBS NBTLUYUFULP-MEOYOULBS ZHYMPUPZHYS TBDEMYMB RTPFYCHPRPMPTSOPUFY OEPVTBFYNSCHN PVTBDPN, OE TBULTSCH UPOSFICE EDYOBUFCH RTY LFPN LBFESPTYY LBYUEUFCHB OYLPZP DBCE OE CHPMOPCHBMY ...
VPTSEUFCHEOOBS FILB VSCHMB PLPOYUBFEMSHOP UCHETZOHFB CHNEUFE U TEMYZYEK Y ЪBNEOEOB RTPUFSCHN OBVPTPN RTBCHIM RPCHEDEOYS UEZP TCE CHSCH IPFYFE FERETSH? LZPYUN - UBNPE NEOSHIE YY RTPSCHMEOIK. Y OBN FERETSH RTDUFFPIF VBOPCHP UPVYTBFSH CH EDYOHA GEMPUFOHA LBTFYOH Y DKHYKH, Y FEMP, Y vPZB UP CHUEK CHUEMEOOPK ...

DB PE CHUЈN PO VSCHM RTBCH! YVP, USCHO TSE TsSh VPTSYK ... ENH NPTSOP.
EUMY PRTEDEMYFSH RPOSFYE ЪMB LBL TBTHYEOYE MAVCHEY J ZBTNPOYY, UFBOEF RPOSFOSCHN, RPYUENKH VSCHMP ULBBOP FBL. NSC RTYIPDYN CH FFF NYT U YUYUFPK DKHYPK, OP RTPZTBNSCH X CHUEI TBOSCHE ...

Be careful with your wishes - they tend to come true.

The novel by Mikhail Bulgakov "Master and Margarita" - the brightest masterpiece and the most mysterious of the novels in the entire history of Russian literature of the XX century. A book that can be read and re-read dozens, hundreds of times, but never fully understood. The cult novel is full of adventure, mystery, irony and endless wisdom.

The novel was first published only 26 years after the death of the author, in 1966, and even then only in an abridged magazine version. The novel gained immediate popularity and was distributed in hand-printed copies before its official publication in 1973.

1. Who told you that there is no real, faithful, eternal love in the world? Let the liar cut off his vile tongue!
2. We speak with you in different languages, as always, but the things we talk about do not change from this.
3. The unhappy man is cruel and callous. And all just because good people disfigured him.
4. Sometimes the best way to ruin a person is to let him choose his own destiny.
5. A man without a surprise inside, in his box, is not interesting.
6. Everything will be right, the world is built on this.
7. - Margarita Nikolaevna did not need money. Margarita Nikolaevna could buy whatever she liked. Among the acquaintances of her husband came across interesting people. Margarita Nikolaevna never touched a primus stove. Margarita Nikolaevna did not know the horrors of living in a shared apartment.
   - In a word .. Was she happy?
   - Not a single minute!
8. Understand that the language can hide the truth, but the eyes can never!
9. It's nice to hear that you are being so polite with your cat. For some reason, cats usually say "you", although not a single cat has ever drunk broodershaft with anyone.
10. Yes, man is mortal, but that would be half the trouble. The bad news is that he is sometimes suddenly mortal, that's the trick!
11. Do you judge by the costume? Never do this. You can be wrong, and, moreover, very large.
12. The one who loves must share the fate of the one he loves.
13. There are no evil people in the world, there are only unhappy people.
14. - Is that vodka? Margarita asked weakly.
    The cat jumped up in his chair in resentment.
    “Have mercy, queen,” he croaked, “would I allow myself to pour a lady of vodka? This is pure alcohol!
15. Brick will never fall on anyone's head for no reason.
16. “You are not Dostoevsky,” said the citizen, bewildered by Koroviev.
    “Well, who knows, who knows,” he answered.
    “Dostoevsky is dead,” said the citizen, but somehow not very confidently.
    - Objection, - Behemoth exclaimed hotly. - Dostoevsky is immortal!
17. People are like people. They love money, but it has always been ... Humanity loves money, whatever it is made of, whether it is leather, paper, bronze or gold. Well, they are frivolous ... well, well ... ordinary people ... in general, they resemble the former ... the housing issue only spoiled them ...
18. Never ask for anything! Never and nothing, and especially for those who are stronger than you. They themselves will offer and they themselves will give everything!
19. The most interesting thing about this lie is that it is a lie from the first to the last word.
20. All theories are worth one another. There is one among them, according to which each will be given according to his faith. May it come true!
21. Nonsense! In three hundred years it will pass.
22. Which country do you prefer wine at this time of day?
23. My drama is that I live with someone I don't love, but I consider it unworthy to spoil his life..
24. - Cowardice is one of the most terrible human vices.
    - I dare to argue with you. Cowardice is the worst human vice.
25. Never be afraid of anything. This is unreasonable.
26. The worst anger is the anger of powerlessness.
27. I'll tell you a story. There was only one aunt in the world. And she had no children and no happiness at all. And at first she cried for a long time, and then she became angry.
28. Annushka has already bought sunflower oil, and not only bought it, but even spilled it. So the meeting will not take place.
29. What would your good do if evil did not exist, and what would the earth look like if the shadows disappeared from it?
30. No matter what pessimists say, the earth is still absolutely beautiful, and under the moon it is simply unique.

Seeing off 2017, I would like to recall another date - 80 years of the title of the novel "The Master and Margarita". At first, the novel had other titles - "The Engineer's Hoof", "The Black Magician" ... The final name - "The Master and Margarita" - took shape in 1937. Quotes from the novel "The Master and Margarita" are timeless classics.

Have mercy ... Would I allow myself to pour a lady of vodka? This is pure alcohol!

We speak with you in different languages, as always, but the things we talk about do not change from this.

Unkindness lurks in men who avoid wine, games, the company of lovely women, table conversation. Such people are either seriously ill, or secretly hate others.

There are no evil people in the world, there are only unhappy people.

These women are difficult people!

A man without a surprise inside, in his box, is not interesting.

Everything will be right, the world is built on this.

Yes, man is mortal, but that would be half the trouble. The bad news is that he is sometimes suddenly mortal, that's the trick!

It's nice to hear that you are being so polite with your cat. For some reason, cats usually say "you", although not a single cat has ever drunk broodershaft with anyone.

The unhappy man is cruel and callous. And all just because good people disfigured him.

Do you judge by the costume? Never do this. You can be wrong, and, moreover, very large.

Never ask for anything! Never and nothing, and especially for those who are stronger than you. They themselves will offer and they themselves will give everything.

The one who loves must share the fate of the one he loves.

Who told you that there is no real, faithful, eternal love in the world? Let the liar cut off his vile tongue!

The second freshness is what nonsense! There is only one freshness - the first, it is also the last. And if the sturgeon is of the second freshness, it means that it is rotten!

It is easy and pleasant to tell the truth.

Why chase in the footsteps of what's already over?

Dostoevsky died.
- Objection, Dostoevsky is immortal!

And fact is the most stubborn thing in the world.

All theories are worth one another. There is one among them, according to which each will be given according to his faith. May it come true!

Which country do you prefer wine at this time of day?

My drama is that I live with someone I do not love, but I consider it unworthy to spoil his life.

Cowardice is one of the most terrible human vices.
- No, I dare to argue with you. Cowardice is the worst human vice.

Never be afraid of anything. This is unreasonable.

The worst anger is the anger of powerlessness.

What would your good do if evil did not exist, and what would the earth look like if the shadows disappeared from it?

Understand that the language can hide the truth, but the eyes can never!